Technology is going more advanced by day by day. Everything is going to be advance to provide a great facility to internet users. As we see that at very beginning web pages or developed only in HTML then its developed and comes CSS, PHP and many other advance platforms to make web pages more beautiful. But here I am not going to describe all these platforms I straight forward go to AMP which is recently released by Google. It has many advantages but it also has some major disadvantages which are listed below;
Major Disavantages of Implementing AMP in to Website
Disappearing links (and ad revenue)
One of the issues with the AMP idea is that content
constructed using AMP is served up through a store on Google's server as
opposed to really connecting to the first page on a distributer's site. This
implies the peruser is investing more energy in Google's site and will see
Google promoting instead of any paid publicizing on the substance supplier's
site. More cash for Google, less cash for the genuine substance maker. Just
last month, Google stated that it is working on fixing this problem so that
linked pages will appear under the original publisher’s URL.
Less
control of your design
In
AMP pages you also lose your control to your custom web design.
Less analytics and more work
Despite the fact that AMP works with Google Analytics, you
need to utilize an alternate tag, which can be very tedious. On the off chance
that you do exclude the new tag, you pass up a huge amount of investigation
data.
In addition, AMP isn't especially simple with regards to
establishment. You essentially need to do all the coding physically. This puts
you before a problem: either structure your site the manner in which you need
it and the manner in which it will change over, and set it up for AMP
later, — or slight transformation and feel and make it an AMP site from the
begin.
Less control of your content
Since AMP is a stripped-down form of your unique substance,
you are at Google's benevolence with regards to how (and regardless of whether)
your substance is really shown. You surrender the general styling of your page
as a byproduct of an actually speedy download. On the off chance that your
webpage includes a great deal of video, AMP would not be that helpful for you
as the download time would basically continue as before.
Harder to spot “fake news” stories
With
increasingly more accentuation being set on the harming impacts of phony news,
AMP makes it significantly harder for perusers to detect these sorts of
stories. Since AMP strips content down to the stripped down and has everything
inside Google's server, everything begins to resemble the other alike. This
implies you can have counterfeit articles and phishing misleading content
stories seem acceptable next to authentic news.
Conclusion:
Taking
everything into account, while we would all be able to concur on the way that a
quicker portable web experience is better for everyone — especially since most
of web surfing is presently done by means of mobile — the expenses of
actualizing AMP may simply be excessively high. On the off chance that you have
a very much planned responsive site with advanced pictures and video, you truly
don't have to stress over AMP.
As
a result of AMP implementation, most web surfers won’t ever leave Google, since
everything they search for will be served to them on Google’s “portal”. This is
not really a “web” of interconnected websites anymore, but a centralized
dystopia.
0 Comments